"Sweat" is not an indulgence... Do you understand if violation of regulations is also an "effort"? What did 11 K-League clubs keep
"Sweat" is not an indulgence... Do you understand if violation of regulations is also an "effort"? What did 11 K-League clubs keep
Blog Article
"I don't think the sweat and hard work of the players is going to be in vain..." The words of Kim Seung-hee, executive director of the Korea Football Association, leave a lingering impression. If the violation of the K-League 1 can be postponed due to sweat and hard work, what will become of the 11 K-League teams that sweated the same amount to comply with the rules.
Asked about the failure to pay the Gwangju FC Solidarity Contribution at an official press conference held at the Korea Football Center in Jongno-gu, Seoul on the morning of the 21st, Executive Director Kim said, "I don't think the players' efforts and sweat are wasted due to administrative errors, not intentional ones," and explained, "We first considered the stability of the league and the protection of players."
This is an incident that cannot be reduced to just an administrative mistake.
Gwangju remitted $3,000 (about 4.2 million won) in solidarity contributions incurred by recruiting North Macedonia striker Asani in December last year, but the remittance was returned by error and registered players in 15 games without being aware of the fact. FIFA regarded this as a clear violation of regulations and imposed a ban on player registration, and the Korea Football Association was also notified, but did not take appropriate measures.
In the process, executive director Kim Seung-hee put forward the justifications of "player protection" and "league stability," but this logic could soon become a dangerous precedent that justifies the collapse of fairness.
The K-League is a professional league in which 12 clubs compete under the same conditions. If even one team is allowed to make exceptions to qualifications to play, player registration, and transfer regulations, the equity of the entire league will collapse. Even if it is true that Gwangju's negligence was an "administrative error" and "no intention" is true, it does not change the essence of violating the rules as a result.
So why have the remaining 11 clubs followed the rules, going through complicated administrative procedures and handling compensation without omission? Is it because they sweated less? No. They are the ones who have formed the league by following the rules, just like Gwangju, or even under more difficult conditions.
Why are their efforts not protected.
FIFA has already introduced an automated settlement system called "Cleaning House" since November 2022. This system automatically calculates compensation details when a transfer occurs and sends money directly to related clubs. In 2024, 88 percent of the total training compensation was processed through the clearing house. In just two years, more than 5,000 clubs around the world have benefited from the system. Benefits have also occurred in countries that lack infrastructure, such as Paraguay and Ghana.
The Korea Football Association (KFA) is still diagnosed as being "settled." After the Gwangju FC incident, the KFA sent an official letter to FIFA and said it was discussing future responses, but in the meantime, the league had already played 15 games and the results had accumulated.
In other words, FIFA did not blame the failure of the system. It just held accountable for not applying it. On the other hand, we reserved the results of the violation of the regulations with administrative errors, sweat, and efforts.
"Fairness is the most important sport in soccer," Kim told a news conference. However, when fairness was challenged, the first word that came out was "sweat." The language of empathy is important. However, empathy cannot replace the rules. 안전놀이터
The rules are cold. It saves the entire league. There can be no value of sweat in a league that has lost fairness. Rather, it will only leave a scar of unfairness on the clubs that followed the rules.